Jobs NowHomesMotorsLocal DirectoryClassifiedsWhats onTV Listings

 
News & events in Burton On Trent




 
 
Today...
Burton Mail > News > Village vicar denies 16 child porn charges

Village vicar denies 16 child porn charges

A VILLAGE vicar has denied 16 charges of making indecent images of children.

News - Rev Dominic StoneRev Dominic Stone, the vicar of Marchington, Marchington Woodlands, Kingstone and Church Leigh, pleaded not guilty to the offences when he appeared at Burton Magistrates’ Court yesterday.

The 46-year-old will stand before the same court on January 5, when he will be committed to crown court.

Stone, of Moisty Lane, Marchington, was granted unconditional bail.

The married father-of-two was arrested in February, bringing an end to seven months of uncertainty for his parishioners.

However, police did not charge Rev Stone until last month.

The Diocese of Lichfield had repeatedly refused to tell parishioners why their vicar was not at work for seven months.

Speaking after his arrest was made public by the Mail, one Marchington resident said: “It’s been going on for far too long now and we all feel we should have been told why our vicar has suddenly disappeared from his duties.

“There is a big shortage of vicars around here and people are suffering from that. Some are having to wait for weeks to arrange funerals.” However, diocesan spokesman Gavin Drake said at the time: “It isn’t right that a person who hasn’t been formally charged or accused of an offence should have their name dragged through the media when they’re unable, because of ongoing police investigations, to offer any public defence.”

 


Comment on this article

Your Name:*
Your Email Address:
Remember Me:
Subject:
Your Comments:*
Please enter text from this image
To confirm and submit this article comment, please enter the text in the image into the text box below.

   Terms and Conditions
Currently displaying the top 1 comments View all 1 comments
It's
Posted By: David Waldock on 12-Nov-2009
I don't know what porn you watch - or for that matter if you watch any - but porn involves adults who have consented to the sexual acts they perform, whether or not people feel that they are being exploited. Porn, whilst generally not discussed in polite company, is enjoyed by many people in the privacy of their own homes without harm others, but rarely is it considered taboo in nature (that is to say, people who watch porn are generally not ostracised from the community). Images of children - who cannot consent - being sexually abuse are NOT porn. They are a record of child sexual abuse. Agencies seeking to reduce the harm to child by sexual exploitation prefer the term "child sexual abuse videos" or "child sexual abuse photos", firstly because they accurately describe the nature of the videos, and secondly because describing it as porn associates it with something which is not illegal and which dilutes the impact of the nature of the media. Let's call it what it is, and not create associate a false association with "Barbara Does Burton".




Article Options Talk about | Email to a Friend | Print this
Social Bookmarking Digg this | del.icio.us | reddit
 

Story First Published: 10/11/2009 21:56:43

Back to top




All the latest news headlines from in and around the local Burton community - Burton Mail, East Staffordshire